W3C Valid XHTML logo
W3C Valid CSS logo
Website by
Zig Website Design Logo
51 Users Online.

A Guide To Local History In The Holsworthy Area.

Revd. G.D. Melhuish - Notes on the History of Ashwater Parish and Church

Population.

What has the population of the Parish been at different periods? No certain answers can be given till recent times when the regular Census came in. According to Domesday Book (AD. 1087), Ashwater Manor had 40 Villani, 12 Bordars and 6 Slaves, whilst Henford Manor had 1 Villanus, 8 Bordars and 1 Slave—68 men all told. If you multiply by 5, you have 340, which would probably not be far from the total population—between 300 and 340 would be a good guess. Our Registers begin in A.D. 1559 but you can’t get anything certain from them as to the population. However, I have taken several periods of 20 years and have counted the Baptisms and Burials in those periods in order to compare them. The astonishing fact that you notice is that the Baptisms in 3 out of the 4 earlier periods far exceed the Burials, whilst in one period only they almost balance. As regards the last period, the rise of Nonconformity has to be taken into account. What took people away from the parish in those days, where did they go? Can someone suggest a cause?

Here are the figures:—

Years1559 to 15791609 to 16281700 to 17101769 to 17881839 to 1858
Baptisms326298226288210
Burials157181224185305

The Census Returns to which I alluded earlier are interesting. I give some of them—
1801—643;
1811—677;
1821—774;
1841—1046 (Highwater mark);
1861—803;
1871—849;
1881—849;
1891—756;
1911—679;
1921—659 (Civil Parish).

The Census Return for 1821 is in The Church Chest, signed by Samuel Balhatchet, Overseer. This gives the following details There Were 397 males and 377 females, 136 families and 133 inhabited houses. 2 houses were being built and 4 were uninhabited. In 1801 there were 115 inhabited houses and in 1811 there were 117. At present there are about 170 houses. There must have been much crowding in days gone by.


Footnote
The Revd's figures give us a little clue but much more information is needed to be precise.
Between 1839 - 1858 Burials reached the high point of 305, but also so did the population at 1046 in 1841. Births were low so where were the younger population at that time?
There are too many gaps in the Baptisms and burials figures to get an accurate picture as in the missing periods they may have compensated somewhat. There was probably only a certain amount of work in the area so people may have migrated to the towns, joined the army or navy etc.
An accurate year by year record of Baptisms and Burials would give a better picture of the population which could then be tied in with expansion of cities and wars fought at that time. We could then work out where they did go.